Here is a question, which will not be welcomed by some, but one which I think needs consideration and discussion: is it necessary to rebuild all of Port au Prince? There has already been open discussion among Haitian leadership about whether the capital of the country should be located right on such a massive, earthquake prone fault line. Another question should be whether so many people should live there.
Haiti is one of the most blatant examples in the western hemisphere of a failed state and a failed economy. If all the buildings could magically be replaced overnight and all the people put back in them, Port au Prince would still be a place of dramatic poverty where people search daily for basic necessities. The best built housing in the world cannot be maintained to any standard by people too poor to pay for health care and food. The level of poverty in Haiti makes some of the poorest parts of America look well off.
Even before the devastation of the earthquake, if you had made an announcement that people would be permitted to leave Haiti, you’d have a million signing up before the day was out. Those Haitians who have managed to gain legal status in the US have created a lifeline to Haiti of financial and other support and probably fifty per cent or more of the population would like to join them here.
Migration is an ordinary part of world history. Since the beginning of humans on the planet, people have left where they once lived to find a better, safer place. Even the so called “native Americans”, the Indian population, is believed to have migrated to North America ten thousand years ago from Asia. The whole history of the world, on every continent, involves the story of migration, its benefits and conflicts. We now have large barriers to such changes, called nations. The richer nations, quite naturally, want to protect themselves from poverty and the problems of health and violence that go with it.
Haiti is, and will remain for many months, an international emergency zone. If this disaster were in a more developed country, the population would already be loading up on jumbo jets and legal provisions would have been made to accept them here.
Is there no place for some Haitians to go? The United States could likely take a hundred thousand without too much trouble. There are nations in central and South America where people with a strong work ethic and long history of not living in luxury might be welcomed.
Consider the cost of supporting a managed migration over the raw cost of, first, supporting that population in Port au Prince for months to come and then helping to pay for the rebuilding. The so called “world community” is now engaged in an effort that literally will take billions of dollars over the next five to ten years. All options should be considered to give Haitians a chance, and perhaps a choice, toward a better life.
Doug Terry, 2.3.10
|